看一眼凌晨4点的美国梅奥诊所 就知道国内医院缺什么

petssky
petssky
petssky
10739
文章
55
评论
2016-04-25
评论
86,635 6671字阅读22分14秒
摘要

北京协和医院年接待患者约226万左右,员工总数4000多人。美国梅奥诊所年接待患者约116万左右,是协和的的一半;员工总数61100人,是协和的15倍。协和医院是国内众多医院的缩影。

吉米老师前言:看一眼凌晨4点的美国梅奥诊所, 你就知道国内医院缺什么!

浅谈中国医疗

It is four o'clock am, in the world's top-ranked Clinic, Mayo Clinic in American, it is empty, with no one.

这是凌晨四点时,全球排名第一的美国梅奥诊所,空荡荡,无一人。

At the same time, in Beijing Union Medical College Hospital,the top1 hospital inChina, one thousand and more people have been waiting in a long queue, waiting to register.  Among them, many had already started to line up from zero o'clock am .

这是凌晨四点时,全中国排名第一的北京协和医院,一千余人已经排起了长长的队伍,等待挂号。他们中,很多人从零点就已经开始排队。

It is said that the United States has a strict hierarchical system treatment, so usually patients do not need to queue up to see a doctor on-site. In fact, this is just a small part. Behind these phenomenon,I want to talk about the two most bitter groups suffering from domestic medical system, although officials disagree it totally.

有人说,美国有严格的分级诊疗制度,平时根本不需要现场排队挂号看病。其实,这只是其一。在这些表象背后,我想谈谈国内的医和患,通过这两个最苦逼的群体,证明一个官方最不认同的结论。

1.What do our hospitals lack?

1、国内的医院缺什么?

The annual reception of patients of Beijing Union Medical College Hospital is about 2.26 million with more than 4,000  employees. While the reception patients at Mayo Clinic in the United States is about 1.16million, half of e Beijing Union Medical College Hospital , and it employs  61100 people, 15 times more than emplyees in BeijingUnion Medical College Hospital. Union Hospital is just a epitome of many domestic hospitals.

北京协和医院年接待患者约226万左右,员工总数4000多人。美国梅奥诊所年接待患者约116万左右,是协和的的一半;员工总数61100人,是协和的15倍。协和医院是国内众多医院的缩影。

What does it mean with such a great contrast to domestic hospitals? It  means:

巨大的反差对国内医院意味着什么呢?这意味着:

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals work as cheap labor in health care. They lack of dignity!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却沦为廉价劳动力,缺尊严!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals suffer from disease cuased by strong and tense work. They lack of health!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却要饱受职业病痛,缺健康!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals work in high-risk condition.They lack of safety!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却沦为风险高危群,缺保障!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals have a higher incidence of sudden death. They lack of rest!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却沦为猝死高发区,缺休息!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals are stuck in endless medical disputes. They lack of peace!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却陷无尽医疗纠纷,缺和谐!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals suffer from  endless abuse and violence. They lack of security!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却遭受无休止打骂,缺安全!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals  still can’t get understanding and support from patients. They lack of recognition!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却得不到理解支持,缺认同!

With more outpatients, doctors and nurses in our hospitals suffer  from bad comments although they are exuasted to die! They lack of respect!

医院赢了门诊量,医护却累死累活不落好,缺地位!

2. Why does it so expensive to get medical service in China? 

2、群众为什么看病难?

About life-saving drugs: for example, It has reported: Chinese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is nearly 10 million people, with an annual increase of about 1.3 million patients, while patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor lack of statistics, but the annual incidence rate is about 1 /100000 -2/10 million, higher than the former.

关于救命药:举个例子,人民网曾报道:中国慢粒白血病患者近10万人,每年新增患者约为1.3万人,胃肠间质瘤患者缺乏数据统计,但年发病率约为1/10万-2/10万人,高于前者。这些昔日被判为绝症的病人,因为瑞士诺华研制成功的药物-格列卫,从而看到了生命得以延续的希望。但是新的问题来了,在中国这种药物一个月的服用费用是23500元,尽管诺华制定了相应的优惠措施,但是一年7.2万的费用对于绝大多数患者来说仍然是一个巨大的负担。格列卫在中国的价格是全球最高的,而在印度才卖200元。为什么?这个问题太难回答了,超出了我的能力。

但是,有信息显示,很多跨国公司生产的这种专利药来到中国往往就成了全球最贵的药。在价格这个利益传导的链条上到处都是吸血鬼,价格低了,他们没有利益。

About drug approval: Now medical order is mess now. Most of people compete without justice for profit. What worse is, in the past few years, our government departments has made serious mistakes in the price examination and approval of drugs.

关于药品审批:现在的医药秩序非常混乱,不仅是大家都为了经济利益,都为了利润而争夺市场,更严重的是过去几年我们政府的部门在药品的审批和药价的核定上出现了严重的问题。我们全国也就七八千种药,但是批出来的药号大概18万、19万差不多,一个品种的药有几十个号,而且批出的价格不一样,同样的药品相差十几倍,这就导致了同药多名、同药多价,难免不产生腐败。这个问题不是出在审批制度本身,而是出在审批环节的不公开、不透明,只有少数人秘密审批,这不是制度问题,这是操作的问题。

About overtreatment: China's current health care system is absurd.Doctors and nurses get super low price for medical care,which can not reflect the real human values.

关于过度医疗:目前我国的医疗服务价格体系是扭曲的,医生、护士劳务价格过低,无法体现人力价值。问题在于重物轻人。凡是跟物有关的就很值钱:导管、钢板等高质量的耗材,核磁、CT等大型检查。但跟人相关的费用却很低:挂号费20多年了一直是5块钱,远低于在医院的停车费;注射费5毛,即使不算其他成本,碘酒、棉签也不止5毛;还有护理费,在北京当今的物价水平下,24小时一级护理的价格是9元。这种导向迫使公立医院靠卖药、卖高质耗材来补偿,而这样的补偿方式非常低效,后果就是过度医疗。

About medical dispute: Dispute Settlement Mechanism of Hospital Medical Executive is  inefficient.

关于医疗纠纷:我国医院医疗纠纷解决机制执行效率低下。理想的情况是医院发生医疗纠纷后,医院或相关机构及时介入处理,当事医生可正常工作。但遗憾的是很多时候在很多医院,医生都扮演了处理医疗纠纷的主要角色,这给当事医生带来了极大的苦恼和包袱,有的甚至因此而自杀身亡。血淋淋的事实证明:在医疗纠纷面前,医院、患者、医生,没有赢家。

About Healthcare Reform: Since 1985  in policy that "give greater autonomy to hospital," Pandora's Box is opened. The hospitals and the doctors  are farther and farther away from public benefit on the road of profit pursuit.

关于医疗改革:自从1985年提出“放权让利,扩大医院的自主权”,潘多拉的魔盒就被打开了,医院和医生在逐利的道路上越走越远,医疗的公益性荡然无存。看病难,看病贵是中国医疗体制的突出问题。医改往深了说,缺乏基础理论,卫生经济学长期并未进入一般大学经济学院的研究领域,而是卫生部下属医科大学的专属。人们不愿意拿和国企同样改制的逻辑来看待医改,因为很多人认为,医疗具有特殊性,然而医疗的特殊性难道比温饱问题还大?当年的国营食堂和供销社在竞争中退场,并未给老百姓的吃饭穿衣造成困扰。

About Medicare reimbursement: the more expensive medicine is, the less reimbursement you will get.

关于医保报销:越是进口的疗效好药,越不报销。我们的医保机构对于医疗服务行为的监督非常薄弱,还对居民的健康权益却设置了种种的限制,比方说我们都是参加医保的,大家在看病报销医药费的时候都有一个目录,这个目录内的是可以报销一部分的,但是还有相当多的药品和服务是在目录外的,是全部不报销的。越是贵重的药、越是进口的药物、越是一些疗效好的药,都不报销。现在问题在于,我们的医保部门只监管报销的费用,对群众自费的费用没有人管。如果我们的公立医院为了创收,就引导老百姓多服用自费的药品和服务,群众的负担怎么会减轻呢?我不赞成我们的费用报销体系是采取一部分报销、一部分不报销的双轨制,凡是与治病救人有关的费用和服务都应该纳入到报销的范围。

About government investment: Recently, the Ministry of Finance announced that the latest data show that in 2015 a total national health and family planning expenditure is 1.1916 trillion yuan,  with an increase of 17.1%.

关于政府投入:近日,财政部公布最新数据显示,2015年累计全国医疗卫生与计划生育支出11916亿元,增长17.1%。作为一名医生,对于财政部公布的医疗卫生支出,我只想问一句话:这些钱,有多少用在了医生护士的身上,有多少用在了老百姓身上?国家投的这些钱,怎么医生、护士和老百姓就没感觉呢?反而看病难、看病贵愈演愈烈!如果政府拨款只用于改善医院的基础设施条件和购买大型设备,这种机制怎么能够让医护有尊严,怎么能够减轻群众的医药费用负担呢?

About profit of hospital: Many domestic hospitals adhere to the principle that: I can give you money to buy equipments, build a house, but we can not guarantee your salary,and doctors have to serve more or make the medical price higher to get money, which is a very important cause of doctor-patient conflict.

关于医院创收:我们很多医院坚持的原则是办事不养人,我可以给你钱买设备、建房子,但是我们不能保证你工资,你去服务创收发工资,这种机制是把我们的医务人员推到了群众利益的对立面,这是导致医患冲突的一个非常重要的原因。既伤害了群众利益,也伤害了我们医务人员尊严和白衣战士的形象。

关于疾病预防控制:2003年非典使我们认识到公共卫生的重要性,于是国家投入巨额的资金加强了基本预防控制体系建设,所以现在应对各种传染病和突发公共卫生的能力明显的增强,但我们在预防各种常见病、多发病、老年病、慢性病等方面,能力依然相当的薄弱现在,心脑血管病、癌症、糖尿病、肾病、肝病等严重疾病仍然在威胁着人民的健康。我们现在卫生控制体系预防控制和疾病治疗是分离的,我们的疾病控制人员大多是应付传染病的传播,而对慢性病、常见病的传播是否没有太多有效的手段。我们的医生大多数是坐诊看病,等病人上门,很少深入到社区、家庭去调查、了解疾病的流行趋势。这方面我们有相当多的工作要做。

About Hospital expansion: now as long as there is an expanded hospital, real estate companies would have a high enthusiasm to build it.

关于医院扩张:现在只要一说医院扩张,房地产企业的积极性就非常高,很多房地产企业主动承诺在新建居民住宅区时,同时在周边无偿建一所大型医院。医疗服务的保障是质量,而质量的保证是人才。可以投资盖很多医院、建很多病房,问题是我们的人才从哪里来。如果我们从全国的角度整体考虑,利用社会资本短期内可以盖很多大型的医院或者医疗城,但是培养不出相应的合格的优质的医疗人才,怎么办?事实也确是如此。如今报考医学院校的医学生越来越少,生源越来越差,优秀的医学生已所剩无几,最终谁受损?

3. Conclusion:The doctors and nurses is aslo  a"scapegoat" and "victim

"

3、结论:医生护士是“替罪羊”和“受害者”

The phenomenon of“Difficult and expensive medical treatment” is not formed overnight, so it is impossible  to solve it overnight.

看病难、看病贵不是一朝一夕形成的,根治看病难、看病贵也不是一朝一夕就能解决的。但有一点必须明确:看病难、看病贵根子不在医生护士,罪责也不在医院。往深了说,医生护士不仅是替罪羊,更是受害者!

weinxin
欢迎关注
喜欢本网站,就扫一扫,关注微信公众号,有惊喜哦~
petssky
  • 本文由 发表于 2016-04-25
  • 转载请务必保留本文链接:https://petssky.com/essay-19502
匿名

发表评论

匿名网友 填写信息

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen: